Is Water Wet?

Listen to a commentary on the discussion or read it in detail below

In a cozy faculty lounge, a diverse group gathers for afternoon coffee. The debate begins when Carlos, a philosophy professor, leans forward with a concerned expression.

Carlos (rubbing his temple):

I can't stop thinking about this. Is water wet? I know it sounds trivial, but the more I think about it... (makes a circular gesture with his coffee cup) If you dry anything that's wet, it continues to exist, right? But if you "dry" water, it ceases to be water. Doesn't that mean that being wet is its very essence?

Ana (graduate student, leaning in with curiosity):

Sorry to interrupt, but could someone explain this better? I always took it for granted that water was wet.

Dr. Marina López (adjusting her glasses with a professorial gesture):

Let's see... Think of a magnet. The magnet attracts metallic objects, but we wouldn't say the magnet is "attracted," would we? Water is similar: it causes wetness but isn't wet itself.

Luis (linguist, browsing through an etymological dictionary):

Aha! This is fascinating. In English, 'wet' and 'water' share the same root. In Spanish, 'mojar' comes from 'malear', meaning to soften. Isn't it curious how language reflects our conceptual confusion?

Jorge (skeptical, crossing his arms):

This all seems like a meaningless word game to me. What practical difference does it make?

Ramón (smiling while grabbing a glass of water):

Let me demonstrate something. (sprinkles flour on his finger) Watch this... (dips finger in water) Ta-da! It comes out dry. Surface tension...

Sara (interrupting with laughter):

Just like my ex! Superficially wet but dry inside.

Everyone laughs, easing the tension of the debate.

AQUA-7 (from a nearby screen):

Let me propose an analogy: Is darkness dark? Is heat hot?

Carlos (thoughtfully):

But then, when I swim, aren't I surrounded by wet water?

Prof. Hiroshi Tanaka (drawing molecules on a napkin):

Think of it this way: water molecules are like dancers. They're not dancing alone; they're in a constant dance of attraction and repulsion.

Ana:

Oh! Like at a party. The party isn't "partied," it just creates the environment for others to have fun.

Carlos (with sudden realization):

Wait... I think I'm starting to see it differently. If water were wet, wouldn't it need to be wetted by something? And that something would have to be... water? It's like an infinite loop.

Sophie (smiling):

Like asking if a dictionary is "dictionaried."

Gilberto (who had been quiet):

That's why I insist: it's an emergent property. Like life itself. You can't point to "life" in a cell; it emerges from interactions.

Jorge (beginning to show interest):

Well, when you put it that way...

Sara:

So water is like a DJ? Doesn't dance but makes everyone dance.

Carlos (laughing and raising his hands in surrender):

You've convinced me! Water isn't wet; it causes wetness. Like a teacher isn't "taught" but teaches.

AQUA-7:

And as an AI, I can say I'm not "intelligenced," I just process information intelligently.

Everyone laughs again.

Ana (taking notes):

So, can we say we've reached a consensus?

Luis:

Yes, although language might trick us, science and logic are clear.

Jorge (now fully engaged): 

What about ice? Is ice dry?

Everyone groans theatrically as Carlos reaches for the coffee pot for another round.

Sara:

Oh no! Here we go again!

Prof. Hiroshi Tanaka:

Perhaps we should save the states of matter debate for next week's coffee break?

AQUA-7:

My processors are already overheating just thinking about it.

Carlos (pouring coffee):

At least we can all agree that coffee is definitely liquid... or can we?

More groans and laughter fill the room as the afternoon sun starts to set on the faculty lounge.

Listen to a commentary on the discussion or read it in detail above